What It Means To Deny The Conclusion Of The Shakespeare-X Message.
Christopher Marlowe, wounded child of the angels, you are made immortal with a kiss.
The Situation For Those In Denial Regarding The Shakespeare Imposture by Christopher Marlowe:
If you unhappily deny the irrefutably conclusive evidence of the Shakespeare-X Message, namely that there was indeed a literary imposture and the works of Shakespeare were in fact written by Christopher Marlowe, using the pseudonym William Shakespeare in all its variations, then this is what you actually believe and proclaim:
Your Unfortunate Position:
If you don’t accept that the evidence of the Shakespeare-X Message irrefutably proves that Christopher Marlowe and William Shakespeare were the same person, then you believe that the two greatest dramatists in history lived in the same city, at exactly the same time in history, writing similar plays on similar subjects, from similar sources, with the same poetic genius, for the same theater group, with their plays and poetry mentioning and relating to one another.
That these were two men who never knew each other in person but had the same friends and lovers. And one of these two playwrights (Shakespeare) had never written anything by the age of 29 until a few weeks after the other (Marlowe) disappeared, when Shakespeare instantly proved himself a literary genius with a poem in Marlowe's style.
Subsequently this same writer (Shakespeare) unaccountably left no real historical record, public or private, of his existence, or of the actual creation of his 40 literary works of poetry and plays, despite being the superstar genius of his age. He then died unmentioned and unmourned by the entire literary community of his city and country, all of whom had known him personally for 27 years.
Neither do you find it relevant that the metanarrative of the entire Shakespeare literary canon bears no relationship to the known life of the successful London actor William Shakespeare of Stratford, but perfectly matches the psychological concerns of a living Christopher Marlowe in exile in Italy.
You also dispute the mathematical meaning of the fact that the two dramatist's names when placed together unambiguously and clearly spell out a message stating: 'Christ Will I Am Shakespeare Over Marlowe.'
Even though the probability of any two randomly chosen men in the Elizabethan era having the names William and Christopher is 1 chance in 1212.
Furthermore, you do not think that a calculated contextual probability for the intensely interwoven historical lives of the two dramatists, Marlowe and Shakespeare, of 1 chance in 3.95 thousand trillion trillion is sufficiently convincing.
My advice to you is that you tell no-one you believe all this.
And if you do believe all this, then I simply don't know what to say to you. Apart from suggesting that you have given up entirely on reason.
And I suspect your motive for doing so.
PS:
A friendly caution offered with the best of will to academic scholars and literary experts.
I wouldn't like to be known as a literary expert who can't recognize the works of William Shakespeare from the works of.. William Shakespeare.
And especially not after they've been told the answer to the authorship question.
I suspect that such a thing would not be that good for my future academic reputation and career..
It is far far wiser to simply bite the bullet.
Christopher Marlowe, wounded child of the angels, you are made immortal with a kiss.
